illuminated.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the illuminated.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host illuminated.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is UK2 - Ltd .

the related websites

illuminatedhealth.com pebblegrey.co.uk toptics.co.uk bathroom-mirror.co.uk favershamcarnival.co.uk bl.uk bathroomcity.co.uk walmart.com matsie.co.uk bristololdvic.org.uk theatreroyal.org.uk jboss.org anishkapoor.com tvstudiohistory.co.uk tannoy.com aldeburgh.co.uk lurongliving.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

-- do we have to choose between brexit and indyref 2? trying to appeal to now-no leavers might be a premature optimisation. by on august 20, 2018 10:33 pm | no comments | no trackbacks wings over scotland says, amongst other things : a second eu referendum and a second indyref do not exist in isolation from each other. each one damages the interests of the other. an independent scotland would reduce the ruk’s chances of reversing brexit, and reversing brexit would damage the arguments for an independent scotland the first part is obvious: given that scotland voted en bloc for remain, rivalled in its intensity only by gibraltar, london and northern ireland, then if scotland had already been independent by the time the brexit referendum was held, leave would definitely have won. and if by any chance scotland managed to declare independence while the ruk was out of the eu, the task of ruk remainers to turn around an increasingly ideologically-polarised polity and rejoin the eu would be that much harder. as for reversing brexit making independence less likely, there are, i think, two reasons, neither of which completely satisfy me. the first and most trivial is that a people’s vote which reverses brexit but ignores indyref 2 (the subject of wings’ most recent ire) might bring to power unionists who would screw over scotland yet again. (how exactly this would differ from the current unionists who are quite happily screwing over scotland is left as an exercise for the reader.) the second is that wings believes that indyref 2 can only be won by appealing to leavers - specifically, yes voters who are now no voters, and voted leave . the basic principle is sound: whether it’s because the eu27 are principled (the four freedoms are sacrosanct, and the eu will not survive if countries are allowed to cherry-pick), or ruthless (throw the uk against a wall just to show the world that the eu means business ), let some other country try leaving the eu first. if that works, an independent scotland can join the ruk in declaring article 50. if it doesn’t, well, now we know. still, though, it seems … odd to argue that scotland and northern ireland remaining in the eu is the only way to fix the northern ireland border problem , but all of the uk remaining in the eu would somehow scupper independence. if the good friday agreement has taught us anything, it’s that answering questions like “is northern ireland part of the uk or part of the republic?” with “all three are part of the eu, so does it matter?” is a very good idea . irrespective of your opinion about gers, it’s undeniable that the arguments against brexit - e.g. the sheer amount of red tape and physical space for customs infrastructure required, and the corresponding economic slowdown - are also arguments against scottish independence from a ruk outside the single market and customs union. one of the reasons the indyref campaign did as well as it did was that alex salmond could confidently reassure people that we’d keep the queen, the pound and the bbc. do you really want to say “ok, brexit is a shitshow, but we would do independence properly”? and more generally: popular opinion is already turning against brexit, and that’s before anything has really happened yet. charlie stross is holding off writing a third near-future scotland book because nobody has any idea what’s going to happen in the next few months , let alone years. talk of a new centrist party always runs up against the formidable barriers of the uk’s fptp electoral system, but it wouldn’t be surprising if one or both of the two major parties split, and/or the uk polity reorganised itself on constitutional lines rather than the current and traditional right/left economic divide. so by all means look at opinion polls and try to work out how to build a coalition for independence. but when indyref2 comes, chances are that a lot of people will have changed their mind. -- don't program in algebra programming is about communicating outcomes, not processes by on august 3, 2018 11:59 pm | no comments | no trackbacks my standard datetime library didn’t have a standard way of saying “th” for days - you know, “monday 1st april” vs “tuesday 2nd april” vs “wednesday 3rd april” vs “any day xxth april probably”. so i went looking for solutions. my favourite example was probably lingua::en::numbers::ordinate because of the way it iteratively works towards the proper solution: sub ordsuf ($) { return 'th' if not(defined($_[0])) or not( 0 + $_[0] ); # 'th' for undef, 0, or anything non-number. my $n = abs($_[0]); # throw away the sign. return 'th' unless $n == int($n); # best possible, i guess. $n %= 100; return 'th' if $n == 11 or $n == 12 or $n == 13; $n %= 10; return 'st' if $n == 1; return 'nd' if $n == 2; return 'rd' if $n == 3; return 'th'; } and the approach i least favoured, even though it’s far more “efficient”, was this one from date::format : @dsuf = (qw(th st nd rd th th th th th th)) x 3; @dsuf[11,12,13] = qw(th th th); @dsuf[30,31] = qw(th st); it’s not just the way that it decides “let’s just do 0..9, 10..19, 20..29 automatically, then manually add 30 and 31” (presumably because that’s part of its data validation - if you ask it for an ordinal of 32 it will tell you that there’s no such day). or the repetition of many “th” between 4 and 9. it’s the fact that the programmer has decided “ok, what’s the problem?”, found a solution, and then decided “ok, how do we make the solution the most efficient possible?” and golfed their way towards the implementation. this is read-only code: it assumes that the problem has been solved, that this is the best way of solving it, and provides no information about why any of this ever happened (which is usually the way of finding bugs: to realise that the previous implementor’s approach was wrong). the most annoying commonplace falsehood about programming is “it’s all about ones and zeroes”. it’s not: it’s been a lifetime since anyone actually programmed a computer by inputting ones and zeroes into anything. it might be ones and zeroes under the hood , but that’s as interesting as saying that the life as a materials chemist is all about quarks. the second most annoying commonplace falsehood about programming is slightly more interesting: it says that programming is all about science, and maths in particular. that may be true in the more refined parts of our industry, but for the most part we’re writing systems that interact with humans rather than particle accelerators or lunar landers. and the way we write code should reflect that. so: if your code is all about o(n) efficiency or what have you, by all means make it efficient. but if you’re just trying to deal with real-world problems, write the code in a way that resembles the real-world problem that you’re trying to solve. the future maintainer will thank you. -- surviving grief ella is helping. by on april 13, 2017 2:50 am | no comments | no trackbacks i used to wake up effectively mummified: two dogs on top of the duvet, on either side of my legs, penning me in. with taji and now habibi gone, that’s not going to happen any more. ella realised something was wrong yesterday morning, and she spent some time in places she normally wouldn’t - under my desk, or at the back of the office where there’s normally no room. she slept beside the bed when i took a nap that evening, even though (i’m guessing) she would have preferred to be outside in the garden. did she think that habibi had been guarding us, and now that habibi was gone that that was now her job? it’s possible. ella is unusually emotionally-sensitive for a dog: whenever i shout at the computer, i can expect her to be there within seconds, concerned that i’m upset. so i hug her, because i want her to be happy, and it turns out that hugging a big happy walking carpet is good for you as well, so we’re both better-off. there’s a thing some people do as part of us thanksgiving, i understand: where you go round the tabl

URL analysis for illuminated.co.uk

http://www.illuminated.co.uk/blog/images/ella/mugdock-lens-flare.png
http://www.illuminated.co.uk/blog/images/habibi/mugdock.jpg
news.bbc.co.uk
chroniclelive.co.uk
illuminated.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
illuminated.co.uk

Registrant:
Sam Kington

Registrant type:
UK Individual

Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Dec-2012

Registrar:
UK2 Limited [Tag = UK2NET]
URL: http://uk2.net

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 06-Mar-1997
Expiry date: 06-Mar-2023
Last updated: 13-Feb-2015

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ultra103.uk2.net
ultra104.uk2.net

WHOIS lookup made at 06:51:07 03-Dec-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS illuminated.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION Sam Kington

TYPE
UK Individual

ADDRESS
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.
Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Dec-2012

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR UK2 Limited [Tag = UK2NET]

  CREATED 1997-03-06

  CHANGED 2015-02-13

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  ULTRA103.UK2.NET 77.92.66.25

  ULTRA104.UK2.NET 77.92.66.26

  NAME illuminated.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .