replicatedtypo.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the replicatedtypo.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host replicatedtypo.com. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is UK2 - Ltd .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

skip to content replicated typo culture, its evolution and anything inbetween evolution: is sex really even sexual? this is a guest post by angarika deb . sexual selection theory, though much celebrated, has faced criticism since its inception. a new model now proposes sexual reproduction and reproductive social behaviour to be cooperative instead of competitive, as was initially advocated earlier by darwin. after the sensational theory of natural selection, darwin outlined the theory of sexual selection in his book, the origin of species (darwin, 1869) and developed it in the descent of man and selection in relation to sex (darwin, 1871). this was in an effort to explain the structural and behavioural peculiarities in animals that did not make complete sense under the light of natural selection, for example ornamented plumage, mate signalling under predation risk etc. natural selection is dependent on a struggle for enhancing individual survival; whereas sexual selection advocates a struggle between the sexes (intersexual competition) and amongst them (intrasexual competition) for rearing maximum progeny. ‘the result is not death to the unsuccessful competitor, but few or no offspring’, as explained by darwin (1871). heritable traits that are deemed detrimental to survival, were explained by sexual selection as conferring an advantage in intrasexual competition for finding mates and intersexual competition between mates to increase their own future reproductive fitness. continue reading “evolution: is sex really even sexual?” author sean posted on 18 february, 2019 18 february, 2019 categories uncategorized leave a comment on evolution: is sex really even sexual? cfp: new directions in language evolution research (special issue of “language dynamics and change”) a couple of months ago, peeter tinits, jonas nölle and i organized a theme session with the fairly generic title “new directions in language evolution research” at the sle conference in tartu. now we are planning a special issue of the journal “language dynamics and change” (ldc) that covers the topics addressed at the workshop (and perhaps a few more). our goal is to emphasize the “new directions” aspect, i.e. to gather really innovative approaches to the evolution of language. we would like to open up the cfp beyond the circle of workshop participants – so everybody interested is invited to submit an abstract, on the basis of which we will make a first selection and invite full papers. note that if we can’t include your paper in the special issue, you can of course still submit it as a regular paper to ldc. if you are interested in contributing, please send an abstract to [email protected] until december 15th. here’s the description of our theme session again: research on language evolution is undoubtedly among the fastest-growing topics in linguistics. this is not a coincidence: while scholars have always been interested in the origin and evolution of language, it is only now that many questions can be addressed empirically drawing on a wealth of data and a multitude of methodological approaches developed in the different disciplines that try to find answers to what has been called “the hardest problem in science” (christiansen & kirby 2003). importantly, any theory of how language may have emerged requires a solid understanding of how language and other communication systems work. as such, the questions in language evolution research are manifold and interface in multiple ways with key open questions in historical and theoretical linguistics: what exactly makes human language unique compared to animal communication systems? how do cognition, communication and transmission shape grammar? which factors can explain linguistic diversity? how and why do languages change? to what extent is thestructure of language(s) shaped by extra-linguistic, environmental factors? over the last 20 years or so, evolutionary linguistics has set out to find answers to these and many more questions. as, e.g., dediu & de boer (2016) have noted, the field of language evolution research is currently coming of age, and it has developed a rich toolkit of widely-adopted methods both for comparative research, which investigates the commonalities and differences between human language and animal communication systems, and for studying the cumulative cultural evolution of sign systems in experimental settings, including both computational and behavioral approaches (see e.g. tallerman & gibson 2012; fitch 2017). in addition, large-scale typological studies have gained importance in recent research on language evolution (e.g. evans 2010). the goal of this workshop is to discuss innovative theoretical and methodological approaches that go beyond the current state of the art by proposing and empirically testing new hypotheses, by developing new or refining existing methods for thestudy of language evolution, and/or by reinterpreting the available evidence inthe light of innovative theoretical frameworks. in this vein, our workshop aims at bringing together researchers from multiple disciplines and theoretical backgrounds to discuss the latest developments in language evolution research. topics include – experimental approaches investigating the emergence and/or development of sign systems in frameworks such as experimental semiotics (e.g. galantucci & garrod 2010) or artificial language learning (e.g. kirby et al. 2014); – empirical research on non-human communication systems as well as comparative research on animal cognition with respect to its relevance for the evolution of cognitive prerequisites for fully-fledged human language (kirby 2017); – approaches using computational modelling and robotics (steels 2011) in order to investigate problems like the grounding of symbol systems in non-symbolic representations (harnad 1990), the emergence of the particular features that make human language unique (kirby2017, smith 2014), or the question to what extent these features are domain-specific, i.e. evolved by natural selection for a specifically linguistic function (culbertson & kirby 2016); – research that explicitly combines expertise from multiple different disciplines, e.g. typology and neurolinguistics (bickel et al. 2015); genomics, archaeology, and linguistics (pakendorf 2014, theofanopoulou et al. 2017); comparative biology and philosophy of language (moore 2016); and many more. this latter trend to cross disciplinary boundaries is also evident in the proposed workshop contributions listed below. for instance, many of them approach long-standing questions from historical-typological linguistics from an evolutionary point of view by combining analyses of large typological databases with computational modelling, focusing on the emergence of (near-)universal patterns or the much-discussed topic of a potential connection between group size andlinguistic complexity. others draw on insights from biology to discuss how thehuman capacity for language came about. what all have in common, however, is that they combine multiple perspectives to shed new light on the question of how language evolved and continues to evolve. references bickel, balthasar, alena witzlack-makarevich, kamal k. choudhary,matthias schlesewsky & ina bornkessel-schlesewsky. 2015. theneurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar:evidence from case marking. plos one 10(8). e0132819. christiansen, morten h. & simon kirby. 2003. language evolution:the hardest problem in science. in morten h. christiansen & simon kirby(eds.), language evolution , 1–15.(oxford studies in the evolution of language 3). oxford: oxford universitypress. culbertson, jennifer & simon kirby. 2016. simplicity andspecificity in language: domain-general biases have domain-specific effects. frontiers in psychology 6.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01964. dediu, dan & bart de boer. 2016. language evolution needs its ownjournal.

URL analysis for replicatedtypo.com

http://www.replicatedtypo.com/cfp-new-directions-in-language-evolution-research-special-issue-of-language-dynamics-and-change/11992.html
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/authors/christian-kliesch
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/notes-toward-a-theory-of-the-corpus-part-1-history/11977.html#more-11977
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/author/sean
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/authors
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/authors/richard-littauer
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/authors/michael-pleyer
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/the-color-game-challenges-for-app-projects/11930.html
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/category/language-evolution
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/about-3
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/color-term-salience-and-cultural-evolution/11974.html
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/page/73
http://www.replicatedtypo.com//#content
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/category/science/linguistics-science
http://www.replicatedtypo.com/color-term-salience-and-cultural-evolution/11974.html#respond

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: REPLICATEDTYPO.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1606280423_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.123-reg.co.uk
Registrar URL: http://www.meshdigital.com
Updated Date: 2019-07-06T02:29:09Z
Creation Date: 2010-07-13T13:41:36Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2020-07-13T13:41:36Z
Registrar: 123-Reg Limited
Registrar IANA ID: 1515
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS1.INTERDNS.CO.UK
Name Server: NS2.INTERDNS.CO.UK
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-08-17T01:55:38Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR 123-Reg Limited

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =replicatedtypo.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME replicatedtypo.com

  CHANGED 2019-07-06

  CREATED 2010-07-13

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.INTERDNS.CO.UK 83.170.124.44

  NS2.INTERDNS.CO.UK 83.170.124.7

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .