primitivecity.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the primitivecity.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host primitivecity.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is WebsiteWelcome.com .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx/1.14.0 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

skip to content president obama goes to cuba this week, president obama went to cuba to, in his words, “bury the last remnants of the cold war”. he called for an end to the economic embargo, which has been in place since fidel castro came to power in 1959, and has only served to harm the cuban people. neo-conservatives, demonstrating that they are, in fact, not true conservatives, have opposed this shift towards a more free-market policy. fox news reports that “the president was cheered enthusiastically when he reiterated his call for the u.s. congress to lift the economic embargo on cuba, calling it an ‘outdated burden on the cuban people'”. obama is right in his assessment of the embargo, since it only serves to hurt the people of cuba, and not the regime of the castros. this is true of embargos in general, which do not harm authoritarian regimes, as is their supposed intent. cuba is a perfect example of this, since fidel castro, and later his brother raul, have been in power for over a half century. in fact, the castros are able to exploit the embargo for their own purpose: as the cuban people have suffered poverty and shortages, the castros have been able to blame the embargo for these problems, deflecting the blame from the communist system. without an embargo, the cuban people would likely cast a more critical eye towards their “leaders”, as well as communism in general. the lifting of the embargo has been met with opposition from the cuban-american community, and in particular, presidential candidate ted cruz , who has referred to president obama’s attempt to improve ties with cuba as “cav[ing] to a communist dictator”. historically, attempts to lift the embargo have also been opposed by neo-conservatives. since the embargo goes against free-market economics, it is disappointing that “conservatives” would oppose its elimination. it is disappointing, but not surprising, since this is indicative of the republican party’s decline away from being a fiscally-conservative party that believed in limited government, and towards a christian theocratic party of rednecks that distinguishes itself from the democratic party only in that its members believe in a different kind of big government. the embargo against cuba interferes with private citizens’ (both cuban and american) ability to engage in trade, and is therefore antithetical to free-market economics. we live in ironic times therefore, when a left-leaning democrat is trying to end the embargo, while being opposed by people who have irreparably ruined the term “conservative”. author brian nolfi posted on 2016-03-24 2016-06-20 categories politics tags castro , cold war , communism , cuba , embargo , free-market , obama , ted cruz 1,293 comments on president obama goes to cuba the burden of intellectual property laws i once had a podcast on this website. most of the content of this podcast consisted of my dissertations, but i also played sound clips from other sources as well as music at the end of each episode. while i never faced any legal consequences for playing music, i was technically in violation of the absurdly complex and onerous intellectual property laws under whose dark cloud we reside. i decided to stop doing the podcast out of concern for potential legal ramifications, or even if those never materialized, out of a desire to keep an image of legitimacy for this website. i could do a podcast without the music and sound clips, which would then just be only my words, in which case doing a blog would serve the same purpose. the laws pertaining to media in the modern era require one to obtain “rights” to be able to use copyrighted material. the process of doing so is laborious, requires payment, and is out of reach to small independent media producers. these laws have a stifling effect on free expression. we need to re-think the entire notion of intellectual property, which in its current interpretation is philosophically unsound, and is detrimental not only to the consumer, but to the media industry as well. obtaining the rights to use music in small independent media is a laborious and bureaucratic process. according to david oxeford of broadcast law blog , “it is not an easy process that will allow routine podcasts or downloads of music programming”. smaller films, and small media productions (such as podcasts, online videos, etc.) simply do not have the money or resources to obtain licenses for any significant amount of music, if any. most podcasts, for example, are made by a very small number of people (often just one person), and licensing in this situation is not simply a financial issue, but an issue of time and energy. most regularly-produced podcasts cannot practically obtain all of the requisite licenses for different music every episode because they would have to spend too much time to do so. so, even if licenses were free, they would still be prohibitive. as a result, the vast majority of podcasts will not be able to legally include licensed music on a regular basis (if at all). effectively, only a large organization would be able to do this, as they have the resources (i.e. lawyers and secretaries) to navigate through the bureaucracy. for example, a music podcast such as “ all songs considered ” is produced by national public radio which has an entire staff. by contrast, most podcasts, which are small, are far from having a staff. as a result, most podcasts would be hard-pressed to legally include one licensed song, let alone do an entire show featuring music. some facts about the details of music licensing are presented here, not for the sake of bogging the reader down in minutiae, but to illustrate the absurd complexity of the phenomenon. the “right to publicly perform sound recordings” is different from “right to reproduce and distribute the music”. the latter is the right that applies to music in a podcast, whereas the former applies to music played on the radio. the rationale here is that a podcast is an on-demand medium, whereas radio content comes randomly to a passive listener, so a podcaster is considered to be be “reproducing” and “distributing” music, while a disc jockey is “publicly performing”. david oxeford says, “for these sorts of on-demand uses, the rights to most recorded music will not be cheap and easy to obtain”. this makes podcasting music more burdensome than playing music on the radio because the “right to reproduce and distribute the music” is more complex than the “right to publicly perform sound recordings”, since it makes the right to the sound recording separate from the right to the musical composition, which may be two different sources. furthermore, the right to the musical composition itself may come from more than one company if the song has multiple writers. in addition to complicating the licensing process, the categorization of podcasting music as “reproduction and distribution” illustrates the failure of an old and out-of-touch industry (backed by and old and out-of-touch government) to recognize music podcasting for what it is: a modern internet equivalent of radio, in which a host selects songs for his or her audience to hear. this means that it should be categorized under “public performance”, not “reproduction and distribution” which would mistakenly equate it with selling music (i.e. compact discs or digital downloads). the music industry makes this mistake out of both ignorance and paranoia towards modern technology and how it is used by younger generations. finally, it is worth noting that all of these bureaucratic hurdles apply to any amount of music played in a podcast, and not just an entire song. in addition to the prohibitive complexity of obtaining the rights to use licensed music, small independent media are also stifled by the cost. according to david oxeford, “getting rights to the full catalog of music typically played by a music intensive radio station will require a negotiation with each record label and the payment of s

URL analysis for primitivecity.com

http://primitivecity.com/index.php/2016/03/24/the-burden-of-intellectual-property-laws/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/2016/03/24/the-burden-of-intellectual-property-laws/#comment-4055
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/tag/podcasting/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/category/politics/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/2016/03/24/the-burden-of-intellectual-property-laws/#comment-4049
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/2016/03/24/the-burden-of-intellectual-property-laws/#comment-4048
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/tag/obama/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/2015/03/26/prologue/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/tag/castro/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/tag/intellectual-property/
http://primitivecity.com/wp-login.php
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/tag/free-market/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/tag/embargo/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/feed/
http://primitivecity.com/index.php/author/bnolfi/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: PRIMITIVECITY.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1898994439_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.launchpad.com
Registrar URL: http://www.launchpad.com
Updated Date: 2018-01-13T05:22:00Z
Creation Date: 2015-01-28T21:24:16Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-01-28T21:24:16Z
Registrar: Launchpad.com, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 955
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS8507.HOSTGATOR.COM
Name Server: NS8508.HOSTGATOR.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-11-13T08:35:24Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Launchpad.com, Inc.

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =primitivecity.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME primitivecity.com

  CHANGED 2018-01-13

  CREATED 2015-01-28

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS8507.HOSTGATOR.COM 50.116.114.74

  NS8508.HOSTGATOR.COM 50.116.114.75

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .