hrdc.net Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the hrdc.net

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host hrdc.net. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Unified Layer .

the related websites

hrdc.mu nsdp.hrdc.mu gtes.hrdc.mu thevoicebw.com cads.hrdc.mu ebi.ac.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx/1.14.0 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

to access all contents in our website, you need to create an account and login. full access on approval is given within 48 hours. . log in × . log in register forgot password? home about sahrdc publications human rights features (hrf) hrf monthly hrf archives internship programme sahrdc reports contact . . hrf - monthly once again, india promises to ratify torture convention in geneva the poverty of imagination- indian foreign policy in myanmar india adrift on its myanmar policy historian who got it wrong smoke and mirrors: india’s human rights report at the . log in × . log in register menu home about us consultancy fees for training workshops search contact us sahrdc publications print publications electronic publications reviews of sahrdc publications sahrdc recommendations sahrdc in the public domain sahrdc in media / internet written and oral statements from intern comments hrf monthly once again, india promises to ratify torture convention in geneva september 22, 2017 of interest was the statement by the nhrc. it was a vastly improved statement than the one made in may. though the nhrc claims it differs from the home ministry on the proposed deportation of rohingya refugees, it is yet to intervene in the supreme court on this matter the adoption of india’s report to the universal periodic review of the un human rights council in geneva last evening, by consensus, hid more than it revealed to the public eye. india blunted the criticism of member states by stating it had accepted 152 out of the 250 recommendations made to it in may, when india’s third periodic report was reviewed. as for the remaining 98 recommendations, india merely took “note” of them. human rights worthies like china, the ivory coast, cuba, egypt, ethiopia, ghana, iran, iraq, kyrghyzstan, peoples democratic republic of laos and libya lauded india’s efforts. it was difficult not to notice the raised eyebrows in many parts of the room when the very democratic lao people’s democratic republic lauded freedom of religion in india! estonia, the little baltic state which is currently president of the european council, was honest. it welcomed india’s decision to ratify the un convention against torture (cat), which india had signed in 1997. india had made a similar commitment during the earlier second periodic review process in 2012. only to forget it before the ink was dry. read more ... hrf monthly the poverty of imagination- indian foreign policy in myanmar september 09,2017 new delhi: unlike the hindu brahminical oral tradition where one does not know where myth ends and history begins, thanks to the buddhist pali tradition of reducing everything to writing, the burmese have a more realistic appreciation of themselves on the difficult terrain of being where indian and chinese aspirations meet. the qing invasions of burma while not forgotten are behind them. modern china has found that power flows through cheque book diplomacy. the burmese have a better measure of new delhi. they are aware that they almost made assam part of burma in 1819. if it was not for british intervention, the indian map of the northeast would have looked very different. read more ... hrf monthly india adrift on its myanmar policy september 7, 2017 it is clear that the chinese have a better appreciation of what the ground situation is in myanmar. the difference is in long term policy formulated by sagacious mandarins in beijing and the establishment in new delhi the ministry of external affairs statement of august 26, titled ‘situation in rakhine state of myanmar’ gave the plot away prior to the visit of prime minister narendra modi to myanmar from september 5-7, 2017. “india is seriously concerned by reports of renewed violence and attacks by terrorists in northern rakhine state myanmar. we are deeply saddened at the loss of lives among members of the myanmar security forces…..” the statement said. in the joint statement issued by india and myanmar on september 6, the previous formulation is repeated. “india condemned the recent terrorist attacks in northern rakhine state, wherein several members of the myanmar security forces lost their lives.” nothing about the enormity of the humanitarian crisis, nothing about the continuing refugee flow into bangladesh and the miniscule earlier spillover into india. read more ... hrf monthly historian who got it wrong historian who got it wrong the right course would have been for army hq to have reprimanded major gogoi, and his superiors who lauded his offence. section 46 of the army act, 1950, penalises “disgraceful conduct of a cruel, indecent or unnatural kind”. june 17, 2017 arjun subramaniam is an accomplished military historian. his defence of major nitin leetul gogoi and general bipin rawat’s comments does his scholarship little credit (‘what they don’t get’, ie, june 15). credible accounts state that farooq ahmad dar was paraded over several kilometres, strapped to a jeep with a placard identifying him as a stone-pelter, accompanied by a warning against stone-pelters, over a loudspeaker. it is nobody’s case that the indian army is not a disciplined army, with a rigorous chain of command and an esprit de corps. however, there is evidence of aberrations. the right course would have been for army hq to have reprimanded major gogoi, and his superiors who lauded his offence. section 46 of the army act, 1950, penalises “disgraceful conduct of a cruel, indecent or unnatural kind”. read more ... hrf monthly smoke and mirrors: india’s human rights report at the un smoke and mirrors: india’s human rights report at the un he final conclusions of upr on india, like all such reviews, need to be read not in cold print, but between the lines may 24, 2017 the career indian diplomat is a grandmaster in the art of obfuscation. however, the mendacity of the submissions by the indian delegation during the examination of india’s record during the universal periodic review (upr) of its human rights record convinced only the naïve back home – and some duplicitous governments in the united nations. the final conclusions of upr on india, like all such reviews, need to be read not in cold print, but between the lines. at the outset, it must be remembered that when it comes to the implementation of universal rights and norms on human rights, the “united nations” must in fact be read in reverse – it is “nations united”, countries against their peoples. most would rather ignore their populations’ clamour for accountability and rights. this, in spite of the valiant efforts of the present un high commissioner for human rights and the under-resourced but intrepid un human rights machinery. most governments do the human rights tango only when it suits their expedient geo-political realities. read more ... hrf monthly striking an own goal: the nhrc submission to the united nations striking an own goal: the nhrc submission to the united nations saturday, may 27,2017 new delhi: the submission of the national human rights commission of india (nhrc) to the recently concluded universal periodic review (upr) of the united nations is a classic. written in a format that would do little credit to a high school student, it symbolizes the deep rot in the nhrc. bad english, faulty sentence construction, a profusion of unexplained, un-elaborated acronyms, and worst of all, bereft of substance - the quality the submission is a matter of shame, an indication of how seriously the nhrc took its duty of setting out the picture of human rights in this country. on to the nhrc’s submission to the upr. recommendation 4 is as follows: “the legal system continues to be dysfunctional with slow disposal of cases and inordinate delay in giving finality to both criminal and civil litigation.” read more ... page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 » end copyright © 2013 south asia human rights documentation centre (sahrdc). all rights reserved. menu home about sahrdc publications human rights features (hrf) hrf monthly hrf archives internship

URL analysis for hrdc.net

http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=categories&id=23&itemid=113
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?limitstart=6
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=featured&itemid=110
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_users&view=reset&itemid=101
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_contact&view=contact&id=1&itemid=107
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=8&itemid=108
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?limitstart=18
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1&itemid=111
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=categories&id=42&itemid=103
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?limitstart=12
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=43&itemid=118
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_users&view=registration&itemid=101
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=21&itemid=106
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=10&itemid=109
http://www.hrdc.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1&itemid=102

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: HRDC.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1292673_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Registrar URL: http://networksolutions.com
Updated Date: 2018-03-29T14:53:37Z
Creation Date: 1998-05-19T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-05-18T04:00:00Z
Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC.
Registrar IANA ID: 2
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8003337680
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS1.BLUEHOST.COM
Name Server: NS2.BLUEHOST.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-10-14T17:47:07Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Network Solutions, LLC.

SERVERS

  SERVER net.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =hrdc.net

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME hrdc.net

  CHANGED 2018-03-29

  CREATED 1998-05-19

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.BLUEHOST.COM 162.159.24.80

  NS2.BLUEHOST.COM 162.159.25.175

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .