chongzhemin.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the chongzhemin.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host chongzhemin.com. Currently, hosted in Malaysia and its service provider is EXA Bytes Network SDN.bhd. .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

skip to content chong zhemin for a better malaysia menu about me why i join dap videos chinese blog scroll down to content posts posted on april 2, 2019 april 3, 2019 my tenth question to zambry – why did atp appoint a quantity surveyor who rendered consultancy services to sdgm which were similar to those provided to atp? the special internal audit report on maps section 4.2.3 stated that there was a possibility that the consultancy services rendered by qs1 to atp were similar with the one provided by qs1 to sdgm. continue reading “my tenth question to zambry – why did atp appoint a quantity surveyor who rendered consultancy services to sdgm which were similar to those provided to atp?” posted on april 1, 2019 april 3, 2019 my ninth question to zambry – why were rm12m paid to sdgm even though supporting documents could not be sighted? the special internal audit report on maps section 4.2.2 stated that there were instances where payment was made to sdgm even though supporting document could not be sighted. a total of rm12m were paid to sdgm for 9 progress claims without any supporting documents. this shows that there is a breakdown of the control process in making payment to sdgm. it is also stated in the special internal audit report that the physical sighting of the construction for the rm12m progress claims could not be sighted. i urge zambry to explain how rm12m can be paid to sdgm without any supporting documents. the approval of these payments to sdgm is a total disregard of the control process. making payments without any supporting document will expose atp to potential fraud claims by sdgm. zambry must explain the control mechanism set in place for the total rm413m payments to sdgm and whether all these control process were followed to ensure that all payments made were genuine payments. media statement by chairman of the audit committee perak corporation berhad and keranji state assemblyman chong zhemin on 1 april 2019. posted on march 31, 2019 april 3, 2019 my eight question to zambry – why sdgm failed to complete the proposed maps construction works despite being paid rm413m by atp? the special internal audit on maps section 4.2.1 stated that the proposed works under the turnkey contract has not been properly completed by sdgm. continue reading “my eight question to zambry – why sdgm failed to complete the proposed maps construction works despite being paid rm413m by atp?” posted on march 30, 2019 april 3, 2019 my seventh question to zambry – how can sdgm went into liquidation after receiving rm413m from atp in direct payments and payments on behalf? the special internal audit report on maps section 3.4 outlined the actual project cost of maps. it is stated in the audit report that atp has paid a total of rm413m to sdgm in direct payments and also payments on behalf. continue reading “my seventh question to zambry – how can sdgm went into liquidation after receiving rm413m from atp in direct payments and payments on behalf?” posted on march 29, 2019 april 1, 2019 my sixth question to zambry – how stating facts in the internal audit report and questioning the decisions made in the maps project is subjecting him to a “trial by the media”? zambry finally came out from hiding yesterday and accused me of subjecting him to a “trial by the media” over the rm217m cost overrun of the maps project. continue reading “my sixth question to zambry – how stating facts in the internal audit report and questioning the decisions made in the maps project is subjecting him to a “trial by the media”?” posted on march 28, 2019 april 1, 2019 my fifth question to zambry – zambry must explain why no feasibility study has been carried out prior to undertake the rm607m maps project? the special internal audit report on maps in section 4.1.1 stated that the decision by pcb to become majority shareholders through pcbd was not been backed by a proper feasibility study. continue reading “my fifth question to zambry – zambry must explain why no feasibility study has been carried out prior to undertake the rm607m maps project?” posted on march 27, 2019 my fourth question to zambry – will zambry dare to declare that he is totally unaware of the increase in cost of maps, the rm250m shareholder advances by pcbd, maps main contractor (sdgm) financial problems and pcb became the only company funding the project despite owning only 51% of shares in atp? zambry has been totally silent since my last media conference on the special internal audit report on maps last saturday. neither did he respond to any of my three questions for the past three days. instead, the state assembly opposition leader saarani came to zambry’s rescue by saying it is not for zambry to answer questions related to maps and that i was seeking cheap publicity. continue reading “my fourth question to zambry – will zambry dare to declare that he is totally unaware of the increase in cost of maps, the rm250m shareholder advances by pcbd, maps main contractor (sdgm) financial problems and pcb became the only company funding the project despite owning only 51% of shares in atp?” posted on march 26, 2019 march 27, 2019 my third question to zambry – why did he allow atp to delay the opening of maps for 18 months and pay rm5.3m to dreamworks in penalty? when atp signed the agreement with dreamworks, it was specified in the agreement that if maps is not open to public on time, atp will need to pay an extension fee penalty. continue reading “my third question to zambry – why did he allow atp to delay the opening of maps for 18 months and pay rm5.3m to dreamworks in penalty?” posted on march 25, 2019 march 27, 2019 my second question to zambry – did zambry plan for the failure to meet the opening date of maps at the end of 2015 when he publicly announced it during the launching of maps in march 2014? during the launching of maps in march 2014, zambry has publicly announced that maps will open its doors to the public by the end of 2015. this has turned out to be a lie as the special internal audit shows that in the turnkey contact between atp and sdgm the date to open up the park is 31 march 2016. continue reading “my second question to zambry – did zambry plan for the failure to meet the opening date of maps at the end of 2015 when he publicly announced it during the launching of maps in march 2014?” posted on march 24, 2019 march 27, 2019 my first question to zambry – why did he allow atp to reduce the retention sum from 10% of the progress claim to 5% and subsequently waived, and the whole amount retained is released to sdgm prior to the completion of the project? the special internal audit report on maps stated in 4.2.6 that retention sum for the progress claims was waived in progress claim no. 23 onwards, and the amount retained has been released prior to the completion of the project. continue reading “my first question to zambry – why did he allow atp to reduce the retention sum from 10% of the progress claim to 5% and subsequently waived, and the whole amount retained is released to sdgm prior to the completion of the project?” posts navigation page 1 page 2 … page 14 next page search for: search recent posts my tenth question to zambry – why did atp appoint a quantity surveyor who rendered consultancy services to sdgm which were similar to those provided to atp? my ninth question to zambry – why were rm12m paid to sdgm even though supporting documents could not be sighted? my eight question to zambry – why sdgm failed to complete the proposed maps construction works despite being paid rm413m by atp? my seventh question to zambry – how can sdgm went into liquidation after receiving rm413m from atp in direct payments and payments on behalf? my sixth question to zambry – how stating facts in the internal audit report and questioning the decisions made in the maps project is subjecting him to a “trial by the media”? archives archives select month april 2019 (2) march 2019 (17) february 2019 (3) january 2019 (1) se

URL analysis for chongzhemin.com

https://chongzhemin.com/page/14
https://chongzhemin.com/news/date/2019/03
https://chongzhemin.com/why-i-join-dap
https://chongzhemin.com/news/603#more-603
https://chongzhemin.com/news/600#more-600
https://chongzhemin.com/news/609#more-609
https://chongzhemin.com/news/597
https://chongzhemin.com/news/594
https://chongzhemin.com/page/2
https://chongzhemin.com/news/612
https://chongzhemin.com/news/590
https://chongzhemin.com/news/621#more-621
https://chongzhemin.com/news/618
https://chongzhemin.com/news/date/2019/04/01
https://chongzhemin.com/news/date/2019/04/02

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: CHONGZHEMIN.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2184321181_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
Updated Date: 2018-02-07T18:08:15Z
Creation Date: 2017-11-07T14:48:42Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-11-07T14:48:42Z
Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS111.MSCHOSTING.COM
Name Server: NS112.MSCHOSTING.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-08-14T09:20:06Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Tucows Domains Inc.

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =chongzhemin.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME chongzhemin.com

  CHANGED 2018-02-07

  CREATED 2017-11-07

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS111.MSCHOSTING.COM 103.6.196.103

  NS112.MSCHOSTING.COM 173.248.148.38

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .